<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stage 4 Product Proliferation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/</link>
	<description>Product management and the ugly side of software product development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:24:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things The Cranky Product Manager Has Learned About Product Management &#124; The Cranky Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-3926</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things The Cranky Product Manager Has Learned About Product Management &#124; The Cranky Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-3926</guid>
		<description>[...] mark the Cranky Product Manager&#8217;s words, you WILL one day be tempted to create all manner of add-on options and product combinations.  It happens to the best of us.  Those freakin&#8217; Option Pushers are always hanging around [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mark the Cranky Product Manager&#8217;s words, you WILL one day be tempted to create all manner of add-on options and product combinations.  It happens to the best of us.  Those freakin&#8217; Option Pushers are always hanging around [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhijit Dange</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhijit Dange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just because you are good at humour does not mean what you say makes sense all the time. I think you have identified an aspect of product companies which one needs to guard against, however you have looked only at one side of it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Editioning&quot; is good in general for the outside world, this way a given prospect customer is most likely to get what he needs or close to it. However, what can end up happening in that once the precedent is set, every junior/ middle level manager worth his ambition decides that he has identified a market innovation opportunity with which he is going to bottom feed. And organizationally, there are not many ways to stop that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have heard of CEOs who zealously guarded their basic value prop and basic product offering and simply allowed competition to come in, sometimes even overtake them from positions of strength in other segments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So it is not a no-brainer, is all I can say - but like most things in life, a good discussion topic!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you are good at humour does not mean what you say makes sense all the time. I think you have identified an aspect of product companies which one needs to guard against, however you have looked only at one side of it. </p>
<p>&#8220;Editioning&#8221; is good in general for the outside world, this way a given prospect customer is most likely to get what he needs or close to it. However, what can end up happening in that once the precedent is set, every junior/ middle level manager worth his ambition decides that he has identified a market innovation opportunity with which he is going to bottom feed. And organizationally, there are not many ways to stop that.</p>
<p>I have heard of CEOs who zealously guarded their basic value prop and basic product offering and simply allowed competition to come in, sometimes even overtake them from positions of strength in other segments.</p>
<p>So it is not a no-brainer, is all I can say &#8211; but like most things in life, a good discussion topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grant</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a lot of merit in having different editions of a product--Good, Better, Best seems like the easiest model to follow--but you have to design them into the product from the beginning. Otherwise...Oh, the pain!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As usual, Cranky Product Manager, you&#039;ve put your finger on an important issue in an acidly funny way. A lot of tech companies just can&#039;t see the value of simple products, and their response to the demand for simplicity is more often than not counterproductive. The fun begins with denial that customers really want something simpler than what the company offers. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of merit in having different editions of a product&#8211;Good, Better, Best seems like the easiest model to follow&#8211;but you have to design them into the product from the beginning. Otherwise&#8230;Oh, the pain!</p>
<p>As usual, Cranky Product Manager, you&#8217;ve put your finger on an important issue in an acidly funny way. A lot of tech companies just can&#8217;t see the value of simple products, and their response to the demand for simplicity is more often than not counterproductive. The fun begins with denial that customers really want something simpler than what the company offers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReportsToCrankyBoss</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>ReportsToCrankyBoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-701</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well said CrankyPM. We have also faced exactly the same situation and the best way to probably go is an ability to do feature on/off  depending on the license provided...The Sales shud also do some extensive market research to provide input back to the product team on market segments as well...&lt;br /&gt;
Now we know....top management with ears cut off exist in almost every nook and corner&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said CrankyPM. We have also faced exactly the same situation and the best way to probably go is an ability to do feature on/off  depending on the license provided&#8230;The Sales shud also do some extensive market research to provide input back to the product team on market segments as well&#8230;<br />
Now we know&#8230;.top management with ears cut off exist in almost every nook and corner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotSoCrankyPM</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>NotSoCrankyPM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-702</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OMG. This sounds EXACTLY like a company I worked for with a very famous narcissistic CEO at its helm. I hope you&#039;re not working for Mr. Narcissist CEO and enduring the &quot;creativity&quot; of the idiots that decide to strategize and rebrand product acquisitions galore! Hilarious stuff by the way. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG. This sounds EXACTLY like a company I worked for with a very famous narcissistic CEO at its helm. I hope you&#8217;re not working for Mr. Narcissist CEO and enduring the &#8220;creativity&#8221; of the idiots that decide to strategize and rebrand product acquisitions galore! Hilarious stuff by the way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob corrigan</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>bob corrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Versioning&quot; on its own isn&#039;t a bad thing - in fact it&#039;s a really good thing. Selling a customer a solution that makes sense for them, as opposed to selling them a great big steaming pile-of-features, is good for everyone.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s one of the reasons licensing software that turns features on and off based on the parameters defined in the key has been so popular.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s also a reason why smart product marketing people articulate a brand architecture up-front, not after-the-fact.  Knowing what feature set your low-end user wants and how that compares to your high-end user allows you to create products that version easily using tools like entitlement keys.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree that &quot;one-off&quot; products are bad.  The only thing worse than selling no licenses is selling one.  But that&#039;s why you specify your versions and the feature sets that are associated with each of them - so you can balance manufacturing convenience with market requirements for relevant versioning.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Versioning&#8221; on its own isn&#8217;t a bad thing &#8211; in fact it&#8217;s a really good thing. Selling a customer a solution that makes sense for them, as opposed to selling them a great big steaming pile-of-features, is good for everyone.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons licensing software that turns features on and off based on the parameters defined in the key has been so popular.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a reason why smart product marketing people articulate a brand architecture up-front, not after-the-fact.  Knowing what feature set your low-end user wants and how that compares to your high-end user allows you to create products that version easily using tools like entitlement keys.</p>
<p>I agree that &#8220;one-off&#8221; products are bad.  The only thing worse than selling no licenses is selling one.  But that&#8217;s why you specify your versions and the feature sets that are associated with each of them &#8211; so you can balance manufacturing convenience with market requirements for relevant versioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The joy of trying to hard to please everyone in a non-personal manner. As you pointed out, discount pricing or value-added sales techniques could have worked better. But rolling a ton of products to fit a variety of niches that may be used only once is a waste of resources. An approach like integrated product management might have helped as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great post!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The joy of trying to hard to please everyone in a non-personal manner. As you pointed out, discount pricing or value-added sales techniques could have worked better. But rolling a ton of products to fit a variety of niches that may be used only once is a waste of resources. An approach like integrated product management might have helped as well.</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too have suffered a similar situation. Perhaps you can relate. It looks like my predecessors allowed the Engineers and Sales Managers to bypass any product management and created dozens of specialized features for the purpose of closing deals. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After a couple of years of this madness, we need more head count than these &quot;fixes&quot; are worth. I am not surprised. So, last August, the new Development Director and I (newly assigned to this product) declared that no new one-offs will be entertained. We put up a wall. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since this edict, there have been no new one-offs. We have produced more output from Development in these last six months than any 12 months prior. The distractions are gone, and we are focused. And Sales still made their number. Sort of makes you go hmmmm.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have suffered a similar situation. Perhaps you can relate. It looks like my predecessors allowed the Engineers and Sales Managers to bypass any product management and created dozens of specialized features for the purpose of closing deals. </p>
<p>After a couple of years of this madness, we need more head count than these &#8220;fixes&#8221; are worth. I am not surprised. So, last August, the new Development Director and I (newly assigned to this product) declared that no new one-offs will be entertained. We put up a wall. </p>
<p>Since this edict, there have been no new one-offs. We have produced more output from Development in these last six months than any 12 months prior. The distractions are gone, and we are focused. And Sales still made their number. Sort of makes you go hmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Oruganti</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Oruganti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is called &#039;being witty&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is called &#8216;being witty&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheThing</title>
		<link>http://crankypm.com/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>TheThing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankypm.com/crankypm/2008/04/stage-4-product-proliferation/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Totally missed you and your brand of humor. Thanks for bringing me out of depression!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally missed you and your brand of humor. Thanks for bringing me out of depression!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
