web counter

Guest Post: The Cranky Marketer Goes Off (Part 1)

by The Cranky Product Manager on March 23, 2009

in Marketing

Today we have a a delicious guest post from an anonymous CRANKY MARKETER.   Whooo hoooo.  Now be warned, this is Part ONE of a three part series.  And the Cranky Product Manager has not yet seen parts two or three.

—————————————————–

First of all, let me say I wasn’t always “cranky”. And in fact, those who know me, would probably not think of the word “cranky” when thinking of me.

Let me also say that I wasn’t always a Marketer.  Nope. I started out life on the “technical” side of things as an SE. From there I moved to Professional Services for a bit, and then moved into Product Management for a number of years. From there Product Marketing and now I manage a Marketing team in a mid-sized B2B company.

I’m telling you all this because, while I need to keep my anonymity, I want you to know I’m not simply a Cranky Marketer, but a Cranky Marketer who’s been in your shoes before.

So why am I cranky?

Because the state of high-tech Marketing.  In most companies I’ve been in, it’s either dysfunctional, broken or at best mediocre. There are some companies that really get Marketing, but for most high-tech companies, particularly those in the B2B space, marketing simply sucks.

Why is it in such a piss-poor state you ask? Well, let me tell you.  Part of the problem lies with the folks running Marketing. Part of the problem lies with Sales and Sr. Management. And part of the problem lies squarely with Product Management. Yeah, you read that right, it’s mostly your fault!

I’m sure most of you reading this want to know why I’m blaming some of it on Product Management. I’ll get to that, but you’ll have to wait a couple of installments to find out.

The Problem with Marketers

Question: What’s another word for “strategic marketing”?

Answer: Oxymoron

Virtually every Marketer you meet will talk about marketing strategy or strategic marketing, but the closest they ever get to that is a 2-day “strategic planning” offsite where they basically decide on all the tactics and programs for the coming year.  A lot of marketers don’t actually know what “strategy” means.

Invariably someone will say something like: “This year, our strategy should be to increase the quality of leads generated”. Hey Doofus, that’s not a strategy, that’s an objective. And besides, why would it be something new? Wouldn’t that be something you’d do every year?

Marketing has become a series of tactical activities executed to achieve tactical objectives. There is usually little if any coherence to the activities, and very little ongoing analysis, and almost certainly no overall strategy. Welcome to my world!

I’m going to give many of my fellow Marketers a pass on taking the full blame for this state of affairs. Most of the problem is not their fault.

The root cause is two-fold.

First, most of the people in high-tech don’t actually understand the markets they are in, the customers and prospects they need to target or the true value propositions of their own products. And by ‘most people’ I mean the vast majority of people who work in the field. This includes Marketers, Sales People, Engineers and yes, even Product Managers. Everyone lives in silos of their own design. They’re like the sardines at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, swimming in circles following each other, never getting anywhere, but not realizing the futility of it all.

Markets are very dynamic, technology consistently changes and customer needs can rapidly evolve. It takes a LOT of time, effort and focus to stay on top of changes across any one market segment. And many companies have products that either span several segments, or sometimes even have separate products (product line portfolios) that address needs of different markets or market segments.

And trust me when I say this, there is not enough time in any day, week or month for most marketers to gain this knowledge on their own. They have to rely on others to provide them with this information. Usually we have to depend on Product Management, which unfortunately seems to be populated by arrogant assholes who do nothing but look down on Marketing. But I’m getting ahead of myself. I’ll get to Product Management’s role in this whole mess later.

Marketers end up reinforcing the very stereotypes they hate. There’s a lot of fluff in Marketing. That’s a stereotype but it’s also true. If you don’t know your own customers, products and markets in deep detail, you can only speak in generalities.  There’s the fluff. And once you are in that zone, it’s hard to get out.

I used to be a Product Manager. I was the product expert. I was the customer expert.  I spent A LOT of time and energy thinking and learning about the market, talking to customers about their problems; talking to partners and prospects and sales engineers and sales people and industry experts etc.

Now I’m in Marketing, and it pains me to say that I’m neither a product expert, nor a customer expert.  I’m a bit of a market expert but I’m nowhere near where I’d like to be. Some of my Product Marketing Managers are pretty good with customers and the market in general, but they are not product experts.

The reality is that as Marketers, we spend very little time speaking with customers to learn more about them. We’re always in pseudo-selling mode, “getting the message out”, “driving demand”, “generating awareness” etc.  We are tactical executioners, working with other teams inside and outside of the company.

In short, we’re a tactical silo, blind to the bigger picture, driven by demand from above but constrained by limited budgets and limited resources and limited knowledge. It’s a no-win situation, and that’s why it sucks.

In my next installment, I’ll get cranky about the impact that Sales and Senior Management have on Marketing and how they don’t help Marketers escape from the tactical silo they live in.

To be continued…..

Be Sociable, Share!

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 David Locke March 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM

If you SEM/SEO for your how do you escape knowing your customers? Are there holes in your content? Are you tuning your content with aggregate statistics, but not keeping track of each customer’s flow through your content? Are your offers not self-selected offers, or offers that segment? Are the segments you defined based on demographics and averages? Do those segments actually fit those that traverse your content?

Reply

2 Cranky Product Mgr March 24, 2009 at 12:37 AM

New blog post: Guest Post: The Cranky Marketer Goes Off (Part 1) http://tinyurl.com/cm3v9p

Reply

3 Gander March 24, 2009 at 6:55 AM

Great post, and I look forward to future installments.

Alas, I have never worked in a place that differentiated Product Management from Product Marketing. We do both. Some (very few) people can do both, many can’t do either, and it is the bane of my existence, balancing the two roles, and trying to recruit people who can do the whole enchilada.

I tend to agree with David’s assertion above. To do marketing (true marketing) you need to understand the product, the market (audience) and how to effectively communicate. In my world, our marketing communications group (loosely aligned with your description of marketing), is more of a service organization. They can schedule blasts, webcasts, mag ads, etc, but they know dangerously little about the products and the technology, so they really can’t work without heavy intervention.

In the dim past, we had a leader in that group that forced all the marketeers under her to get their hands dirty and understand our products (hardware and SW), so that they could intuit the best vehicles for communications.

Alas, that level of competency has gone by the wayside, and we are burdened with a group that is not much better than FedEx-Kinkos. Pretty good at turning around an order, but no real marketing.

I anxiously await the next installment(s)

Reply

4 Melody Jones March 24, 2009 at 9:47 AM

Can’t wait for Part 2 – RT @crankypm New blog post: Guest Post: The Cranky Marketer Goes Off (Part 1) http://tinyurl.com/cm3v9p

Reply

5 Cranky Designer March 25, 2009 at 11:44 AM

I work in a large software company and know what you are talking about. I think I know where this is going…because the marketing folks don’t actually understand the products, the market, or the messages and benefits, they are always asking the PMs for this info. So, if the only value they bring to the table is posting the presentation that you (the PM) spent 3 nights creating, then why do they have a job? Oh, wait, I turned into a cranky pm (lower case), instead of the Cranky Designer – that’s a whole ‘nother story related to fugly screenshots…
CD

Reply

6 LK March 25, 2009 at 4:00 PM

I find that much of the problem lies with the lack of a consistent job description for PMs. Different companies have different Sales and Marketing department structures where Marketing is often ill defined. In my experience with smaller to mid-sized companies, a structure that includes Product manager(s) with Marcom support is the ideal situation. PMs drive the messaging and determine what is needed for marketing and sales support and then Marketing Communications executes. One understands the product, customers and competition and the other understands graphic arts, visual optimization, email marketing, PR, web site design, SEO, etc. etc. If they work well together, I actually think good things can happen.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: