Comments on: Guest Post: The Cranky Engineer Responds to a PRD http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/ Product management, product marketing, and the ugly side of software product development. Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:27:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Denton Gentry http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4580 Denton Gentry Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:46:11 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4580 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@doctorow Be sure the carrier pigeons deliver payloads in order. Suggest http://bit.ly/2lQ05 for a similar problem space.</span></span> @doctorow Be sure the carrier pigeons deliver payloads in order. Suggest http://bit.ly/2lQ05 for a similar problem space.

]]> By: Denton Gentry http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4581 Denton Gentry Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:50:22 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4581 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">We can survive future DDOS attacks by adopting an alternate, robust networking solution for tweets. http://bit.ly/2lQ05</span></span> We can survive future DDOS attacks by adopting an alternate, robust networking solution for tweets. http://bit.ly/2lQ05

]]> By: Josh Chandler http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4582 Josh Chandler Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:49:25 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4582 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@joshchandler Spec for Twitter via carrier pigeon: http://bit.ly/2lQ05 (crankypm.com) (via @dgentry)</span></span> @joshchandler Spec for Twitter via carrier pigeon: http://bit.ly/2lQ05 (crankypm.com) (via @dgentry)

]]> By: Denton Gentry http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4583 Denton Gentry Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:43:56 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4583 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@joshchandler Spec for Twitter via carrier pigeon: http://bit.ly/2lQ05 (crankypm.com)</span></span> @joshchandler Spec for Twitter via carrier pigeon: http://bit.ly/2lQ05 (crankypm.com)

]]> By: nlcarter08 http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4584 nlcarter08 Thu, 28 May 2009 23:42:36 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4584 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">http://bit.ly/Fuul Hilarious, even in "Engineer". (I only do my own real-time bi-directional translation, sorry!)</span></span> http://bit.ly/Fuul Hilarious, even in “Engineer”. (I only do my own real-time bi-directional translation, sorry!)

]]> By: Eden Shochat http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4585 Eden Shochat Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:32:46 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4585 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">"The Cranky Engineer Responds to a PRD" - http://snurl.com/fnb2d - implemented at #kinnernet sans TTL</span></span> “The Cranky Engineer Responds to a PRD” – http://snurl.com/fnb2d – implemented at #kinnernet sans TTL

]]> By: Eitan Shay http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4586 Eitan Shay Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:34:48 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4586 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">The Cranky Engineer responds to a PRD http://bit.ly/Fuul</span></span> The Cranky Engineer responds to a PRD http://bit.ly/Fuul

]]> By: Ragini Pathak http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4587 Ragini Pathak Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:03:53 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4587 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Cranky engineers crankier response to a PRD - http://tinyurl.com/c5pgta</span></span> Cranky engineers crankier response to a PRD – http://tinyurl.com/c5pgta

]]> By: Ragini Pathak http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-4588 Ragini Pathak Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:03:53 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-4588 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Cranky engineers crankier response to a PRD - http://tinyurl.com/c5pgta</span></span> Cranky engineers crankier response to a PRD – http://tinyurl.com/c5pgta

]]> By: JustAnotherProductManager http://crankypm.com/2009/04/guest-post-cranky-engineer-responds-prd/comment-page-1/#comment-3387 JustAnotherProductManager Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:09:06 +0000 http://crankypm.com/?p=1207#comment-3387 I believe this approach leaves out the possibility of stray packets -- er, that is stray pigeons arriving in the queue. It might be necessary to check for malformed pigeons as part of the process to ensure that a carrier is not used that does not implement TTL -- leading to duplicate pigeons and redundant information. Of course, a little birdseed and some implantable TTL mechanisms might provide a failover mechanism in the event that the initial feathered cadre is eaten by falcons. (Very nice blog post, by the way.) (I've always wanted to write a requirements document that included carnivorous activity. To bad birdtwitter(tm) isn't my product.) I believe this approach leaves out the possibility of stray packets — er, that is stray pigeons arriving in the queue. It might be necessary to check for malformed pigeons as part of the process to ensure that a carrier is not used that does not implement TTL — leading to duplicate pigeons and redundant information. Of course, a little birdseed and some implantable TTL mechanisms might provide a failover mechanism in the event that the initial feathered cadre is eaten by falcons.

(Very nice blog post, by the way.)

(I’ve always wanted to write a requirements document that included carnivorous activity. To bad birdtwitter(tm) isn’t my product.)

]]>